10 Poly AI Alternatives to Try in 2025 (Free & Paid Options)

Choosing a voice AI provider need not feel like an unhedged risk. If you’re evaluating a Poly AI alternative, focus on real phone calls over the PSTN, with features such as low round-trip latency, reliable barge-in, accent tolerance, and clean handoffs in Twilio, Genesys, NICE, or Avaya. You want a phone agent that understands complex questions, plugs into your existing systems without needing months of custom wiring, meets your latency budget, and won’t surprise you with unexpected billing.
Getting this right is critical, as McKinsey estimates 30–45% productivity gains in customer care from generative AI. This guide compares Poly AI alternatives on pricing clarity, telephony fit, data controls, and the technical details that determine success or failure on a live call.
What is Poly AI?
Poly AI builds voice agents for phone support, including automated account lookups, payments, appointment scheduling, and guided troubleshooting. Its agents are designed to handle complex queries, understand different accents, and integrate with existing contact-center systems to cut wait times and free human staff for more sensitive calls. It’s popular with enterprises that want branded voices, natural turn-taking, and clean hand-offs into existing contact centers and CRMs.
Why are people looking for an alternative to Poly.ai
1. Pricing is not transparent
PolyAI doesn’t share public per-minute rates. You have to go through sales, and deals are custom-quoted. For CFOs and CTOs who want to model costs at 50k–200k minutes, this feels like a black box. Many alternatives now publish clear rate cards or token tables.
2. Latency can feel noticeable.
On real phone lines (the PSTN), calls can take around three-quarters of a second to process. That delay is enough to make conversations feel less natural. Some newer platforms are hitting faster speeds, which makes barge-in smoother.
3. Barge-in is limited by delay.
“Barge-in” means you can interrupt the bot mid-sentence. With PolyAI, the feature exists, but the slight lag makes it clunky. People want bots that stop talking instantly when the caller jumps in.
4. Support for multilingual speech and accents
Enterprises serving many regions need speech recognition that can handle accents and noisy environments. PolyAI describes multi-provider ASR testing and pre-training across 15+ languages. But some users report struggles with regional accents and informal speech. Alternatives that are trained on wider datasets sometimes perform better.
5. Telephony integrations are managed, not self-serve.
PolyAI integrates with Twilio, Genesys, NICE, and Five9, but they manage the setup themselves. That means in-house teams don’t get direct control of the telephony path. Developer-first platforms give engineers more hands-on knobs.
6. Little model flexibility
You can’t choose which LLM or speech model powers PolyAI. It’s all bundled. Competitors like Retell let you bring your own model (OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google) and swap providers for speech recognition or text-to-speech.
7. Analytics could go deeper.
PolyAI gives basic dashboards, transcripts, and call summaries. But some buyers want real-time sentiment, intent drift, and agent-assist analytics. Alternatives often show richer reporting or easier exports.
Comparison Table of the Best Poly AI Alternatives
While selecting the names of the best Poly AI alternative tools, we considered 2025 product updates, docs that prove PSTN/SIP fit, pricing pages or metering models, recent reviews, and real deployment evidence.
Company | Telephony/ SIP Fit | Pricing Transparency |
---|---|---|
Cognigy.AI | SIP + Twilio/Genesys connectors | Sales-only; custom quotes; Trial on request |
Kore.ai | Twilio Voice channel | Free developer tier published |
Amazon Lex + Connect | Native AWS telephony | Clear pay-as-you-go, Free tier |
Google Dialogflow CX | SIP/Telephony & Twilio | Pay-as-you-go pricing, GCP trial credits |
IBM Watson Assistant | Web-first (phone via partners) | Free Lite plan published, |
Genesys Cloud AI | Built-in CCaaS | Free tokens |
Retell AI | Twilio + SIP via config | Detailed per-minute pricing, free credits available |
Voiceflow | Web-first (can integrate SIP) | Tiered pricing is visible; A free tier is provided |
Yellow.ai | Omnichannel, including telephony. | Freemium plan published |
Rasa | Self-hosted – BYO SIP | Open-source (free) |
Top 10 poly AI Alternatives
1. Cognigy: Best Poly AI Alternative
Cognigy is an enterprise AI platform that connects to your SBCs and SIP trunks, supports barge-in, and plugs into major CCaaS stacks. Organizations typically select this platform when they want more control over how calls are handled and clear rules for compliance. Recent updates added the option to host speech data in the EU for companies that need to keep information within that region.
Best Use Cases: Enterprise IVR modernization, PCI/HIPAA-aware phone flows, Global rollouts with SBC/SIP controls
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
First-party Voice Gateway with SIP trunk docs. | Learning curve for complex flows, as often mentioned by reviewers. |
Barge-in and voice tuning updates are tracked in the 2025 notes. | Setup can be more complicated than “SDK-first” tools. |
Is Cognigy better than PolyAI?
Yes, Cognigy will suit you better if you need SIP calling as the primary integration, the ability to keep data in multiple regions, and strong contact center analytics built into the platform.
Must Read: 20 Best AI Chatbot in 2025
2. Kore.ai
Kore.ai gives you one platform to design, test, launch, and manage bots for customers and employees. You can build and run voice and chat agents without heavy coding. It provides a no/low-code builder, analytics, governance, and a documented Twilio Voice setup. You can run calls on Kore’s Voice Gateway or plug into third-party voice channels like Twilio or AudioCodes.
Best use cases: Twilio Voice bots with warm transfer, Omnichannel assistants across voice and messaging, Internal IT/HR, and contact-center automation on one platform
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Unified suite: self-service, agent assist, automated QA | Integration complexity shows up on larger builds |
Barge-in and voice tuning updates are tracked. | Advanced IVR logic still needs engineering effort |
Is Kore.ai better than PolyAI?
If you want hands-on Twilio control and a broad platform that supports both customer-facing and internal automation, Kore.ai is easier to try.
3. AWS (Lex + Amazon Connect)
Businesses already invested in AWS often pair Lex for speech recognition and natural language understanding with Amazon Connect for call handling and routing. Lex has a free tier that offers thousands of speech requests per month for the first year, which makes it low-risk for pilots. This option works best for organizations that want cloud-native control with AWS security baked in.
Best use cases: Call flows built entirely on AWS, Payment or compliance workloads needing strict IAM controls, and Pilots that can take advantage of the Lex free tier
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
The free Lex tier reduces pilot risk | More integration work compared to all-in-one suites. |
Wide partner network for voices and speech models | Getting barge-in to feel natural takes extra fine-tuning |
Is AWS better than PolyAI?
For builders who want total control and predictable metering, yes.
4. Google Dialogflow CX
Dialogflow CX is Google’s conversation platform for voice and chat. It’s designed for complex, multi-turn flows using a clear, state-based model where you map each step and what happens next with a visual builder. You get Google speech tech, first-party SIP docs, and options for Google telephony or Twilio. New accounts get trial credits, so many teams prototype on credits before paying.
Best Use Cases: SIP/SBC voice bots with mutual-TLS requirements, Twilio-connected pilots, large customer-service routing on Google Cloud, multi-channel assistants (voice and text)
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Detailed SIP/SBC documentation (mTLS, headers, ciphers) | Phone Gateway numbers are limited to the US. |
Excellent NLU capabilities for understanding user intent. | You’ll assemble a full CX (CRM/CTI) yourself. |
Is Dialogflow CX better than PolyAI?
If you’re on Google Cloud and want Google Speech as well as detailed SIP docs, go with Dialogflow CX.
5. IBM Watson Assistant
IBM Watson Assistant is part of IBM’s WatsonX platform. Data stays in approved regions, access is locked down, every change is auditable, and customer data isn’t used to train public models, which makes it the tool of choice for regulated sectors. The straightforward builder allows users to deploy and maintain flows effortlessly. You can connect phone lines over SIP via providers like Genesys or Twilio.
Best use cases: Regulated customer service in banking and healthcare, internal helpdesk and HR self-service, transactional flows like appointment booking and order tracking
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Proven stability in large rollouts. | Live developer support can feel limited. |
A point-and-click builder that your staff can learn quickly. | Pricing leans toward enterprise budgets. |
Is IBM Watson Assistant better than PolyAI?
If you need compliance and data control (privacy, audit, encryption) over most other features, IBM is the right choice for you.
6. Genesys Cloud AI
Genesys Cloud AI gives you voice bots that hold multi-turn conversations, understand intent well, transcribe calls in real time, and hand off to agents when needed. Because it’s part of Genesys Cloud CX, it works with routing, queues, and reports out of the box. You also get predictive routing, Copilot for agent assist, and built-in analytics, QA, and escalations, which cuts setup work.
Best use cases: Contact centers already on Genesys Cloud, voice bots billed by tokens with built-in analytics, predictive routing that pairs callers with the best agent
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Monthly free tokens let teams trial features before paying. | Feature rollouts can lag; docs and training sometimes trail releases. |
Published SLAs and global regions. | Token consumption needs oversight to avoid surprise costs at scale. |
Is Genesys better than PolyAI?
Genesys is the sensible option if you currently use Genesys Cloud and want AI, routing, analytics, and agent tools all in one location.
7. Retell AI
Retell is a developer-friendly voice agent platform built to cut call latency. It offers clear per-minute pricing with free credits, supports Twilio and SIP, and streams audio for quicker turn-taking. The API platform comes with extras that make real-world use smoother, such as keypad input for menu navigation, sending text messages during a call, and exporting call data to a spreadsheet for analysis.
Best use cases: Fast proof-of-concepts needing working phone numbers quickly, Twilio-centric deployments or projects that lean on SIP connectivity with measurable latency targets, Real-time, conversational sales or customer support agents
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Transparent per-minute pricing with free credits makes it easy to start and test without risk | SMS is presently US-only via Retell numbers. |
Industry-leading low latency (620 ms) for natural conversations | More of a toolkit than a full suite, as you’ll need to wire in CRM, analytics, or compliance features yourself |
Is Retell better than PolyAI?
If you need clear pricing, quick tests, and Twilio fit, then Retell wins hands-down.
8. Voiceflow
Voiceflow is a low-code, collaborative workspace for designing, prototyping, and deploying chat and voice assistants. Users can map logic, test, and comment in real time using its visual flow editor. Therefore, by connecting to third-party LLMs and NLUs, you can keep control of your stack. It is an excellent choice for complex, multi-channel projects where engineers, designers, and project managers work together.
Best use cases: team-based design and prototyping, multi-channel assistants with mixed LLM/NLU backends, stakeholder reviews and rapid iteration, handoff from design to engineering
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Real-time collaboration with a clear visual editor | Higher latency (~950 ms) than many other options |
Flexible integrations across LLMs and NLUs | Per-editor pricing can add up as teams grow |
Is Voiceflow better than PolyAI?
Yes, if you want collaborative design and fast prototyping across channels.
9. Yellow.ai
It’s built to handle conversations on chat and voice for both customers and employees without juggling different tools. You get a drag-and-drop builder, so teams can ship a bot in hours, without any need for coding. The suite is packed with voice agents, WebRTC testing, and IVR integrations, including SIP. The tool works in 135+ languages across 35+ channels.
Best use cases: Conversation-based shopping where the bot helps with comparisons, payments, and refunds, automation across WhatsApp/phone/web in multiple languages
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
You can reuse flows, translate content, and switch channels as needed, resulting in faster launches. | You’ll need a sales call for prices, which slows budgeting and makes vendor comparisons harder. |
Even your non-technical teams can add FAQs, tweak replies, change routing, or publish updates with the no-code builder. | Custom APIs, complex IVR flows, and data joins still need engineers. |
Is Yellow.ai better than PolyAI?
If you’re willing to pay for scale and want voice along with messaging and an insights layer, Yellow.ai is a good fit.
10. Rasa
Rasa is an open-source framework where you control models, data, and runtime. You can also self-host on-prem or in a private cloud. The architecture separates NLU from dialogue management, so the behavior is traceable and testable. It’s a fit when data sovereignty matters or when you need fine-tuned models and custom pipelines. However, although the enterprise edition adds support, it starts at a higher price.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
You can self-host anywhere, with no vendor lock-in. | Needs an in-house team to train models and run the infrastructure (data prep, training, monitoring). |
Active community with templates and plugins. | Harder to deploy and maintain than managed suites. |
Is Rasa better than PolyAI?
Yes, if you need maximum control and self-hosting, and you can staff the build.
How to Pick the Right Poly AI Alternative for Your Needs
Selecting the right platform requires you to focus on how the system will actually perform in your business environment. Essential checks to run before making a decision include:
1. Telephony Fit
Find out how the agent will connect to your phone lines. Look for documented support for standard phone protocols and ready-made, certified connectors for CCaaS platforms you may already use, like Twilio, Genesys, NICE, or Avaya. Make sure that the system supports warm transfers, i.e., lets a caller move smoothly to a human agent without losing context.
2. Latency Budget
Delays make conversations feel robotic. For conversations to feel natural, aim for a total response time of under 800 milliseconds from when a caller stops speaking to when the AI replies.
Try this quick test before you buy:
- Call a real phone number, not a browser demo.
- Try interrupting the system in the middle of a sentence. The AI agent is operating effectively if it stops in less than a second.
- To ensure the best possible customer experience, try adding some background noise, such as fans, traffic, or conversation, and repeat the test.
- Speak quickly, and say numbers or names in your own accent.
If delays approach or exceed one second, expect callers to notice.
3. Model Control
Decide if you need flexibility in model choice. Some vendors allow you to pick options like OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google, and swap between different speech engines such as AWS, Google, or ElevenLabs. Others are closed systems where you can’t adjust models, guardrails, or evaluation methods.
4. Data & Security
Ask where your data will be stored and how it will be processed. Verify whether they possess the required certifications, such as GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS. Additionally, check to see if they can automatically delete private data from the transcripts, such as credit card numbers or IDs.
5. Workflow Integration
Check how well the voice AI integrates with the tools you already use. Does it have ready-made connectors for your CRM or IT helpdesk? Otherwise, you might be stuck building everything from scratch. And what happens if you hit a scenario that those connectors don’t cover? Can the system still trigger simple actions in the background?
6. Cost & Scale
Don’t stop at the headline price. Find out how the vendors charge: by the token, by the request, or by the minute. Then map that against your expected call volumes and number of simultaneous users. If the pricing is hidden behind sales quotes, budget planning will be hampered.
7. Proof-of-Concept Path
The fastest way to cut through marketing gimmicks is to test the tool yourself. Prioritize vendors that let you do that, either with a free tier, starter credits, or an open-source edition you can set up with minimal effort. A POC will tell you far more about latency, voice quality, and integrations than any brochure.
Conclusion
The combination of noticeable latency, accent gaps, managed-only setup, and opaque pricing makes tech-savvy buyers of today test alternatives to Poly AI before adding an AI-powered voice assistant to their customer support ecosystem. If you are on the lookout for a Poly.ai free alternative, don’t choose by brand. Go for the right fit for your company’s unique requirements.
Verify data controls and residency, measure actual latency on live calls, and validate telephone behavior in your business environment. Additionally, demand clear pricing. Run a brief spike using free tiers or OSS. And finally, create a shortlist of the best Poly AI alternatives vendors who meet your KPIs with reliable analytics and effortless agent handoffs.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the best poly.ai alternative for high-volume phone support?
Platforms such as Cognigy and Google Dialogflow CX are popular for high-volume enterprise support. Or Genesys Cloud AI inside Genesys CX stacks tends to be a safe bet. They provide the stability needed for mission-critical operations, are scalable, and integrate well with contact center infrastructure. Remember to validate on your flows and minutes.
Are there any Poly AI alternatives, free to try?
Yes, many alternatives have free tiers. Rasa is open source. You can download and run it on your own hardware. Voiceflow is a collaborative designer with a free plan for individuals.
What is included or limited in a Poly AI free alternative?
Free alternatives to Poly AI often come with limitations, such as the number of projects you can create, the number of API calls you receive, or the number of monthly active users you can support. Paid plans may also be essential to access advanced features, including enterprise-grade security, single sign-on (SSO), or dedicated support.
How do I migrate to alternatives to Poly AI without breaking call flows?
When moving to a new voice AI system, start by linking it to your current phone provider so that calls can be routed to reach the right place. Bring over familiar elements like IVR menu options and knowledge bases to keep the customer experience consistent. Test the transfer of calls to human agents by running the new and old systems simultaneously. Once the AI starts to function reliably well, track performance and increase the traffic gradually
How much does a Poly AI alternative cost?
Developer-first stacks often land in the $0.10–$0.25/min band depending on LLM/TTS/telephony; CCaaS suites use tokens or enterprise contracts. 100,000 minutes could cost between $7,000 and $8,000 a month with a pay-as-you-go platform like Synthflow, plus any telephony or LLM fees.